• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Blanch & Hart

Fairfax Co. Criminal Attorneys

  • Our Firm
  • Practice Areas
    • Reckless Driving and Speeding
    • DWI Offenses
    • Driver’s License Offenses
    • Hit and Run
    • Possession of Marijuana
    • Felony Drug Possession / Distribution
    • Larceny and Theft Offenses
    • Violent Crimes
    • Sex Offenses
    • Homicide
    • Criminal Appeals
    • Financial Crimes
    • Expungements
    • Family Law
  • Attorneys
    • Patrick M. Blanch
    • Carly J. Hart
  • News & Information
  • Make a Payment
  • Find Info On Your Case
  • Testimonials
  • Contact Us

Fairfax

4085 Chain Bridge Road, #302
Fairfax, Virginia 22030

Phone: (703) 934-8580
Fax: (703) 934-8583

Info ZBO / November 7, 2012

As Predicted, Virginia Supreme Court Holds That Firearm Charges Can Be Served Concurrently

On October 16th, the Court of Appeals issued an opinion in the case of Commonwealth v. Jefferson, in which it held that mandatory minimum sentences for child pornography cases can be run concurrently – that is, the court can allow the defendant to serve multiple sentences at the same time. The Court of Appeals in Jefferson distinguished a similar case holding that mandatory minimum firearm charges cannot be served concurrently, but must instead be served one after the other. On this blog, we commented that “[t]his case creates some tension in the law and it would seem that this case is a good candidate for review by the Virginia Supreme Court to clarify the issue” because “it is logically difficult to see how the statute at issue in Bullock compelled the result in Bullock while the statute at issue in [Jefferson] compelled a different conclusion.”

It didn’t take long for the Virginia Supreme Court to conduct the review we felt was likely. On November 1st, the Virginia Supreme Court issued an opinion in Brown v. Commonwealth, in which the Court overruled Bullock and held that mandatory minimum firearm charges can be served concurrently. More broadly, the Supreme Court held that in the absence of express language prohibiting sentences from being run concurrently, a trial court is always authorized to do so, even in cases involving mandatory minimum sentences.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Primary Sidebar

Request a Consultation


Footer

Contact Us

4085 Chain Bridge Road, #302
Fairfax, Virginia 22030

Phone: (703) 934-8580
Fax: (703) 934-8583
Email: contactus@blanchandhart.com

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Phone

Blanch & Hart

We hope that you will call us, send us an e-mail, or fill out our online form from any page on this website to set up a free appointment to discuss your case, in our offices or over the phone.

 

Every case is different.  Past results are not a prediction of what will happen in any particular case.

Recent Posts

  • Virginia Assembly Votes to Abolish the Death Penalty
  • Virginia General Assembly Considering Expanding Expungement Eligibility
  • Virginia considering changes to the Court of Appeals
  • Virginia requires video recording of police interrogations
  • Virginia now allows a restricted license for drivers who refuse alcohol testing

Copyright © 2023 · Blanch & Hart · All Rights Reserved