• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Blanch & Hart

Fairfax Co. Criminal Attorneys

  • Our Firm
  • Practice Areas
    • Reckless Driving and Speeding
    • DWI Offenses
    • Driver’s License Offenses
    • Hit and Run
    • Possession of Marijuana
    • Felony Drug Possession / Distribution
    • Larceny and Theft Offenses
    • Violent Crimes
    • Sex Offenses
    • Homicide
    • Criminal Appeals
    • Financial Crimes
    • Expungements
    • Family Law
  • Attorneys
    • Patrick M. Blanch
    • Carly J. Hart
  • News & Information
  • Make a Payment
  • Find Info On Your Case
  • Testimonials
  • Contact Us

Fairfax

4085 Chain Bridge Road, #302
Fairfax, Virginia 22030

Phone: (703) 934-8580
Fax: (703) 934-8583

Patrick Blanch / August 24, 2020

Virginia requires video recording of police interrogations

One of the most common problems in the criminal justice system has been the he-said she-said nature of police interrogations that are not recorded.  The police claim that the accused made some kind of damaging admission, and the accused denies ever making that statement.  Another variation is that a accused admits making the statement, but asserts that the police omitted important context that make the statement sound much worse than it actually was.   Countless trials have boiled down to who the jury believes in this situation, and our firm has handled more than a few of them.

In the past, the success of this kind of defense sometimes depended upon whether the community where the case is being tried generally trusts (or does not trust) their police agency.  There is reason to hope that this problem will end, or at least be substantially reduced, in the near future.  Beginning July 1, Virginia has required the police to make an “audiovisual recording” (read: video) of police interrogations, unless the equipment fails, the equipment is unavailable, or the interrogation occurs in the midst of a public safety emergency that prevents the recording.  Given that most everyone (including the police) carry a smart phone, we expect it will be difficult for officers to justify a failure to record.

The bad news is that the failure to record by the police does not prevent them for testifying about the unrecorded statement of a suspect.  The good news is that this law may cause judges to instruct juries to consider whether they should believe a police officer who fails to make a recording without a valid excuse.  In the past, such a jury instruction would have been much harder to get.

The new law, HB 1023, can be found here: https://lis.virginia.gov/cgi-bin/legp604.exe?201+ful+CHAP1126

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Primary Sidebar

Request a Consultation


Footer

Contact Us

4085 Chain Bridge Road, #302
Fairfax, Virginia 22030

Phone: (703) 934-8580
Fax: (703) 934-8583
Email: contactus@blanchandhart.com

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Phone

Blanch & Hart

We hope that you will call us, send us an e-mail, or fill out our online form from any page on this website to set up a free appointment to discuss your case, in our offices or over the phone.

 

Every case is different.  Past results are not a prediction of what will happen in any particular case.

Recent Posts

  • Virginia Assembly Votes to Abolish the Death Penalty
  • Virginia General Assembly Considering Expanding Expungement Eligibility
  • Virginia considering changes to the Court of Appeals
  • Virginia requires video recording of police interrogations
  • Virginia now allows a restricted license for drivers who refuse alcohol testing

Copyright © 2023 · Blanch & Hart · All Rights Reserved